In mid-2008, Rasmussen conducted a poll to find out how Americans felt about Internet regulation. 49% said that they thought the government should regulate the Internet in much the same way that it regulates radio and television.
This trend toward government regulation of the Internet is due to fears about children being exposed to online violence or pornography and abuse by social networking predators.
A Glance at Censorship.
Censorship of Internet content is on the rise, and it is not just limited to communist China anymore. By way of example, in the UK, a page within Wikipedia (and in some instances, the entire Wikipedia site) was blocked from UK web viewers because someone filed a complaint with the IWF, a quasi-governmental agency. An album cover was viewed as offensive and inappropriate. Since it was a photo of a physical good, there was the possibility that Amazon’s US auction and shopping content would be blocked from UK viewers.
Also in the censorship arena is the increasing volume of politicians who are complaining about blogs not correctly reporting the facts about their campaigns or other political events. The regulatory environment may be further impacted by journalists and mainstream media who are seeing online content take a bite out of their readership and sales. While news and political reporting are not currently regulated in the United States, it would not be surprising if politicians begin to talk about licensing requirements or some form of authority ranking for blog owners and other online reporters.
Nationwide Filtering.
If it becomes law, Australia’s ‘great firewall’ will be the most restrictive mandatory government control of the Internet in the world’s democratic countries. Ostensibly for filtering out child pornography, the firewall has fueled intense debate, including free speech arguments. The government reportedly will ban at least 1300 websites, but it has not disclosed exactly what sites are on the banned list. Although the filter is not completely accurate and its effectiveness is therefore questionable, it slows down Internet speeds by up to 86%.
Internet Taxes.
On a federal level in the United States, there have been rumors about Internet taxation for many years but nothing has come of it. Many Americans, including Congressional representatives, are leery of an Internet sales tax. Budget-challenged state governments, on the other hand, are eyeing the Internet as a source of revenue. For instance, the state of New York has imposed a tough state sales tax law that would make non-resident vendors responsible for reporting taxes on sales to New York residents. Amazon, which has affiliates all over the world, has sued, and as of this writing, a decision has not been rendered. Do not be surprised if Internet taxation becomes an issue in upcoming years.
Licensing and Disclosures.
There has been talk by some legislators about licensing Internet use. Their reasoning is that is a person has to get a license to drive a car, then he or she needs to get a license to surf the Internet’s information highway. To get a license, users would have to pass a test on basic Internet and computer knowledge, such as how to use email, how to run an anti-virus program and so on. While it is unlikely that this idea will gain traction, it is not unreasonable to speculate that content writers will need to follow licensing and disclosure requirements for their web publications. With copyright violations, politicians griping about the accuracy of news, and regulations concerning what can and cannot be said with respect to medical or health related products online, public accountability is not a far fetched idea. For instance, the new Internet regulations in Canada (if passed in February 2009) will address Canadian content and copyright issues and might impose a ranking system on websites that is similar to movie ranking systems. Given the opinion of many Americans that the Internet should be regulated in the same way that radio and television is regulated, the logical conclusion is that Internet publishers will need to register with whatever agency is created to administer online media.
Conclusion.
The above examples provide a glimpse into what the future may hold when it comes to Internet regulation. Given the increasing public opinion that the Internet should be regulated, it is likely that we Internet publishers will see an increasing amount of regulatory proposals that may affect us.
One thing that web publishers can do, right now, to start to protect themselves is to include a legally sound privacy policy statement on their websites. You can find out how to write a privacy policy at the NotGuru blog.
From time to time, Internet regulation and trends are reviewed here: Internet Regulation articles at the NotGuru blog.